Most vendors make you choose between recording risk and doing the work.

The gap between the two is where analyst time goes.

Legacy GRC digitises the bureaucracy. It gives you somewhere to record risk, then leaves the work to your analysts. The rollout comes first and the value comes later.

Point AI tools read and stop. You get an extraction, then you are back in spreadsheets to do anything with it. Nothing carries forward.

The decision loses its evidence. The case is cleared in one system and the exposure recorded in another. The trail is rebuilt when someone asks.

Every function buys its own tool. Procurement, compliance and risk each pick a product. The organisation pays five times for one picture.

Risk Llama does the work and keeps it

Start with the decision in front of you. Get value on the first file. The AI Data Room reads the file, runs your checks, and returns a scored case with the evidence and the reasons.

Upload one file and get an assessed case back the same day.

Apply your own checks and thresholds rather than a vendor template.

Skip the six-month rollout before anything is returned to you.

Stay because the decision does not end there. Keep what the decision produced. The case you cleared becomes a vendor you monitor, an entry on your register, and a line in your board report, on the same platform.

Carry the evidence from the assessment into the register entry.

Link market monitoring back to the risk it affects.

Reach the board pack with the audit trail intact.

One supplier, end to end. Follow a single thread through the platform. A supplier sends its financials. The AI Data Room flags a covenant breach with the figure and the page attached. That becomes a register entry carrying the same evidence, Market Watch links a news item to it, and it reaches the board pack without re-keying.

Read the document and attach the figure and the page it came from.

Create the register entry with that evidence already on it.

Report it upward without rebuilding the story afterwards.

Designed for buyers comparing legacy GRC against point AI tools

The aim is to make risk work easier to run, easier to evidence and easier to explain. Approved value figures: 50 to 70 percent less manual analyst workload, the 5 percent annual EBITDA loss caused by data silos, and an estimated 75 to 85 percent Year 1 saving against a stack of five vendors.

For Chief Risk Officers. One platform for origination and ongoing risk, with the trail intact.

For Finance. One price rather than five licences and five integrations.

For Teams In A Legacy Contract. Ask about the Bridge Offer for teams migrating off legacy GRC.

Start with one file and see where it leads.

If your team is still rebuilding the story after every decision, we can show you a cleaner operating model. Book a live demo and bring one file.